Examples¶
New to AgentFEM? Explore three practical starting points: AI-assisted simulation, learning from finite-element data, and an interactive structural-design demonstration.
Examples are executable parts of the software, not screenshots of possible features. Each example identifies the physical problem, numerical route, important output, and present maturity. Release examples carry numerical contracts; engineering examples exercise broader workflows that still require problem-specific qualification.
Example index¶
| Example | Physics and procedure | Maturity |
|---|---|---|
| Wave packet with an inclusion | Heterogeneous solid wave, explicit central difference | Release |
| 2D static elasticity | Plane-strain linear solid, direct linear solve | Release |
| NAFEMS LE10 3D elasticity | Curved quadratic 3D solid, pressure, external stress target | Release |
| Axisymmetric thick cylinder | Full-revolution linear solid, direct linear solve | Release |
| Transient heat transfer | Heat equation, backward Euler | Release |
| Modal cantilever | Linear solid, generalized Hermitian eigensolve | Engineering |
| NAFEMS R0016 Test 5H direct harmonic response | 3D linear solid, Rayleigh damping, direct frequency sweep | Engineering |
| Abaqus periodic hyperelastic cell | Imported 3D quadratic mesh, equations, finite strain | Engineering |
| Implicit creep relaxation | 3D power-law creep, global/local Newton and cutback | Engineering |
| Viscoelastic relaxation | 3D generalized-Maxwell equilibrium, exact state and restart | Engineering |
| Viscoelastic harmonic response | 3D generalized-Maxwell direct frequency-domain response | Experimental |
| Elasticity surrogate campaign | Repeated FEM, accepted dataset, surrogate and fallback | Release |
| Science supershear data protocol | Public-data identity, XLSX inspection, research handoff | Experimental |
Wave packet with an inclusion¶
Release
A Gaussian-modulated elastic wave crosses a stiff circular inclusion. The workflow brings together heterogeneous material regions, explicit central difference, a time-dependent source, periodic projection, an absorbing boundary, probes, progress events, and time-series fields.
Read the complete flagship example · Source code
2D static elasticity¶
Release
A compact cantilever demonstrates Study, mesh, named boundaries, displacement,
isotropic elasticity, strong constraints, traction, a linear step, standard
U/S/E/MISES output, a Golden observable, and release-quality verification.
Source code · Linear-solid guide · Golden benchmark record
NAFEMS LE10 3D elasticity¶
Release
The public NAFEMS LE10 thick elliptical plate exercises the complete 3D static-solid workflow: curved quadratic hexahedral geometry, quadratic displacement, component constraints, surface pressure, standard result fields, stress recovery, force balance, and energy balance. The versioned mesh obtains \(\sigma_{yy}(D)=-5.399\) MPa, 0.35% from the published -5.38 MPa target, and retains AgentFEM's unsmoothed DG0 stress as the default scientific field.
Source code · Benchmark record · NAFEMS benchmark index
Axisymmetric thick cylinder¶
Release
A Q2 meridian model of a long pressurized cylinder demonstrates native
axisymmetric strain, full (r, theta, z) stress, the 2*pi*r physical measure,
pressure loading, standard output, and comparison with the analytical Lamé
solution. The same formulation is consumed by the stateful J2 and implicit
creep providers.
Source code · Solid-mechanics guide · Benchmark record
Transient heat transfer¶
Release
This case exercises capacity and conduction operators, backward-Euler time integration, accepted-increment progress, temperature histories, unified field output, and a release Golden observable.
Source code · Heat-transfer guide
Modal cantilever¶
Engineering
A quadratic plane-stress cantilever exercises the public linear modal procedure: constrained stiffness and consistent mass assembly, SLEPc's generalized Hermitian eigensolve, positive natural frequencies, mass-normalized mode fields, eigenpair residuals, orthogonality, cluster semantics, and serial/two-rank agreement. Mode fields are relative spatial patterns; they are not physical displacement amplitudes.
Source code · Dynamics guide · Benchmark record
NAFEMS R0016 Test 5H direct harmonic response¶
Engineering
This public three-dimensional forced-vibration comparison exercises the provider-neutral direct harmonic procedure with visible stiffness, mass, viscous damping, loss stiffness, and load operators. The frozen 50-point frequency sweep checks peak frequency, displacement amplitude, a declared stress-recovery channel, residual, cyclic energy balance, applied resultant, serial/two-rank agreement, and portable scalar-ledger restart. Its acceptance limits are AgentFEM release gates, not NAFEMS tolerances.
0.3.3 evidence and numerical comparison · Executable benchmark · Benchmark record
Abaqus periodic hyperelastic cell¶
Engineering
This workflow directly imports an Abaqus C3D10H mesh and equation constraints, preserves quadratic-node and hybrid/constant-pressure identity, solves a P2/DG0 finite-strain Neo-Hookean problem with exact periodic constraints, and writes homogenized and visualization results.
Research background. This benchmark is informed by Haoming Luo's work with Julie Diani, Kostas Danas, and Zahra Hooshmand-Ahoor on the finite-strain response of nonlinear elastic composites containing particles or voids: Numerical estimation via remeshing and analytical modeling of nonlinear elastic composites.
Read the complete periodic-cell workflow before running the case; it explains the source files, element mapping, periodic semantics, nonlinear controls, and output.
Source directory · Finite-strain theory
Implicit creep relaxation¶
Engineering
A three-dimensional power-law creep problem exercises quadrature state, backward-Euler constitutive integration, analytical consistent tangent, physical-time automatic incrementation, rollback/cutback, creep output, energy evidence, and restart. The same global step can consume a prescribed temperature field through the Arrhenius material factory.
Source code · Creep and inelasticity · Constitutive equations
Viscoelastic relaxation¶
Engineering
A three-dimensional generalized-Maxwell solid is ramped to a prescribed strain and then held. The global Step combines exact Prony-branch updates, committed quadrature state, incremental equilibrium, standard stress/strain/ energy fields, nonnegative viscous dissipation, temperature-shift support and restart. Its automated homogeneous patch matches the closed-form stress after both the ramp and hold. A separate three-dimensional traction-controlled rod test matches the published Abaqus 0.001 s and 50 s creep response.
Source code · Dynamics and viscoelasticity · Golden benchmark record · External rod benchmark
Viscoelastic harmonic response¶
Experimental
A three-dimensional generalized-Maxwell bar demonstrates one material-specific consumer of the direct harmonic procedure without requiring a complex PETSc build. Storage and loss stiffness, optional inertia and a load phasor are lowered to one exact real block system; the common result publishes real, imaginary, amplitude and phase displacement fields together with material-loss evidence. This material coupling remains experimental even though the generic linear structural direct harmonic procedure is engineering maturity.
Source code · Direct harmonic response · Golden benchmark record
Hot-wall creep assessment¶
Engineering
The hot-wall case performs a thermal/thermoelastic finite-element workflow and then an explicitly identified local creep assessment. It demonstrates how the software distinguishes a global field solution from a material-point or assessment-level model.
Elasticity surrogate campaign¶
Release
The campaign varies declared parameters, runs the same finite-element model, records failures and evidence, creates an accepted scientific dataset, trains a surrogate, checks its applicability domain, and retains an FEM fallback.
Source code · Simulation to learning
Science supershear data protocol¶
examples/science_supershear_v5_protocol.py verifies the pinned Dryad file
identities and inventories the public Science 2023 crack-speed, wave-speed,
Mach-cone, material-response, and SED/KED workbooks. It is the data boundary
for the Science Supershear V5 protocol,
not a parameter fit disguised as an example.
Reading an example¶
Do not copy only the final solver call. Read the Study, dimensional assumption, mesh and regions, material data, loads and constraints, procedure, output request, result policy, and benchmark evidence as one scientific workflow. When adapting an example, any change to physics, discretization, material law, or loading may require new verification evidence.